
Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
Copyright © 1995-5/14/2012 Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Subject index to Alaska Supreme Court Opinions.
Word Search the Alaska Supreme
Court Opinions
Older Alaska Supreme Court Opinions .
Alaska Appellate Courts' Case Management System
Recent Alaska Supreme Court Opinions
(From 1/1/2012)
- Paula E. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (5/8/2012) sp-6671
- [Constitutional] (notice as part of due process)
- [Family Law] (ICWA notice requirements; placement preferences)
- Estate of Shawn Martin Mickelsen v. North-Wend Foods, Inc. (4/27/2012) sp-6670
- [Procedure, Civil] (dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6))
- [Torts] (landowner duty of care; traditional analysis of tort
case, duty, breach, causation, damage)
- Stephanie W. v. Maxwell V. (4/27/2012) sp-6669
- [Family Law] (close and continuing relationship; continuity
and stability; maintain sibling ties; defer to the trial court)
- Smith v. State (4/27/2012) sp-6668
- [Constitutional] (constitutional claim; statutes of limitation apply)
- [Procedure, Civil] (constitutional claim; statutes of limitation apply)
- [Real Estate] (inverse condemnation)
- [Torts] (continuing violations doctrine)
- Sitkans for Responsible Government v. City & Borough of Sitka (4/20/2012) sp-6667
- [Constitutional] (liberal application of voter initiatives)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (moot claims)
- Heather W. v. Rudy R. (4/20/2012) sp-6666
- [Family Law] (2-step process to modify custody; history of domestic violence)
- Rofkar v. State (4/20/2012) sp-6665
- [Criminal] (Whitton guidelines, double jeopardy)
- Gottstein v. Kraft (4/13/2012) sp-6664
- [Real Estate] (conveyance of family home)
- Hunter v. Conwell (4/13/2012) sp-6663
- [Family Law] (2-step process to modify custody; importance of
telephonic visitation; deference to trial judge)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (defer to trial judge when evidence is oral testimony)
- In Re Shea (4/6/2012) sp-6662
- [Attorneys and Judges] (lawyer disciplinary action)
- Nelson v. State (4/6/2012) sp-6661
- [Attorneys and Judges] (ineffective assistance case; presumption of lawyer
competence)
- [Criminal] (ineffective assistance case; presumption of lawyer
competence)
- In Re Necessity for the Hospitalization of Joan K. (4/6/2012) sp-6660
- [Administrative Agencies] (appeal from involuntary commitment order)
- [Evidence] (definition of "clear and convincing evidence")
- [Procedure, Appellate] (when court will overrule prior decision; appeal from
involuntary commitment order)
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula Borough (4/6/2012) sp-6659
- [Attorneys and Judges] (no prevailing party on multiple issues)
- [Municipal Corporations] (sales tax authority; initiative cannot appropriate)
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula Borough (4/6/2012) sp-6658
- [Attorneys and Judges] (no prevailing party on multiple issues)
- [Municipal Corporations] (sales tax authority; initiative cannot appropriate)
- Borgen v. A&M Motors, Inc. (3/30/2012) sp-6657
- [Business, Commercial/Labor Law] (innocent material misrepresentation under UTPA)
- Wilson v. Wilson (3/9/2012) sp-6656, 271 P3d 1098
- [Family Law] (jurisdiction to grant divorce over nonresident)
- State, Dept. of Corrections v. Heisey (3/2/2012) sp-6655, 271 P3d 1082
- [Torts] (state immunity from certain specified tort claims;
Alaska has not yet recognized Bivens-type claims)
- In the Matter of the Protective Proceedings of Tammy J. (3/2/2012) sp-6654, 270 P3d 805
- [Probate] (guardian for developmentally disabled adult child)
- Kelly v. Municipality of Anchorage (3/2/2012) sp-6653, 270 P3d 801
- [Procedure, Civil] (procedure for deciding summary judgment)
- [Torts] (four essentials of a negligence claim; two situations
when a public entity may be liable for a “dangerous condition.)
- Trudell v. Hibbert (2/17/2012) sp-6652
- [Workers' Compensation] (definition of "project owner")
- Gold Country Estates Preservation Group, Inc. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough (2/10/2012) sp-6651, 270 P3d 787
- [Administrative Agencies] (Open Meetings Act)
- [Municipal Corporations] (Open Meetings Act)
- [Procedure, Appellate] (when court will hear moot case)
- Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc. (2/10/2012) sp-6650
- [Contracts] (fraud constitutes breach as matter of law;
oral evidence allowed in fraudulent inducement claim); statute
of limitations, discovery rule)
- [Equity] (quasi-estoppel)
- [Procedure, Civil] (motion for JNOV must be based on motion
for directed verdict)
- [Torts] (statute of limitations, discovery rule; abuse
of process)
- Boyko v. Anchorage School District (1/27/2012) sp-6649, 268 P3d 1097
- [Procedure, Appellate] (review of summary judgment on appeal)
- [Torts] (immunity of employer who provides reference)
- Roberson v. Manning (1/27/2012) sp-6648, 268 P3d 1090
- [Business, Commercial/Labor Law] (transfer of title for personal property; good-faith
purchaser under the UCC)
- [Contracts] (gift without consideration not enforceable)
- David S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (1/20/2012) sp-6647, 270 P3d 767
- [Family Law] (parental rights termination-ICWA)
- Oates v. Holly (1/20/2012) sp-6646, 268 P3d 1084
- [Contracts] (voiding a contract through mutual mistake)
- [Real Estate] (partition of real estate; mutual mistake)
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson (1/20/2012) sp-6645, 270 P3d 755
- [Administrative Agencies] (interest on refund of fees)
- Barton v. North Slope Borough School District (1/20/2012) sp-6644, 268 P3d 346
- [Evidence] (Evidence Rule 702, liberal approach to admitting
expert testimony; burden of proof when expert excluded)
- McLaren v. McLaren (1/20/2012) sp-6643, 268 P3d 323
- [Family Law] (Wanberg guidelines; 50-50 division presumed
equitable; dividing property acquired during premarital
cohabitation)
- [Procedure, Civil] (trial court obligation to pro se litigants)
- Kiernan v. Creech (1/20/2012) sp-6642, 268 P3d 312
- [Contracts] (promissory estoppel; part performance)
- [Equity] (promissory estoppel; part performance)
- Weinberger v. Weinmeister (1/20/2012) sp-6641, 268 P3d 305
- [Family Law] (overcome domestic violence presumption in
child custody case; tender years doctrine)
- Stephanie F. v. George C. (1/20/2012) sp-6640, 270 P3d 737
- [Evidence] (defer to trial judge on credibility issues)
- [Family Law] (overcome domestic violence presumption in
child custody case)
- [Statutory Construction] (use of "may" denotes discretion)
- Oels v. Anchorage Police Dept. Employees Association (1/20/2012) sp-6639
- [Municipal Corporations] (interpretation of municipal ordinance)
- State, Dept. of Natural Resources v. Nondalton Tribal Council (1/20/2012) sp-6638, 268 P3d 293
- [Administrative Agencies] (when is a land use plan a regulation?)
- Ennen v. Integon Indemnity Corporation (1/20/2012) sp-6637, 268 P3d 277
- [Business, Commercial/Labor Law] (bad faith claim by unnamed insured)
- [Torts] (bad faith claim by unnamed insured)
- Doe v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (1/13/2012) sp-6636
- [Family Law] (father's incarceration, terminate parental rights; active
efforts to reunite family)
- State v. Gibson (1/13/2012) sp-6635, 267 P3d 645
- [Constitutional] (emergency aid exception to search warrant)
- [Criminal] (emergency aid exception to search warrant)
- In the Matter of the Adoption of Xavier K., a Minor (1/13/2012) sp-6634, 268 P3d 274
- [Family Law] (using adoption to terminate parental rights)
- Grace v. Peterson (1/13/2012) sp-6633, 269 P3d 663
- [Family Law] (spouse's tort recovery, marital or non-marital?)
- Martha S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services (1/13/2012) sp-6632, 268 P3d 1066
- [Evidence] (expert testimony by out-of-state psychologist; child's
statement to therapist admissible in CINA case)
- [Family Law] (child's statement to therapist in CINA case)
- HP Limited Partnership v. Kenai River Airpark, LLC (1/13/2012) sp-6631, 270 P3d 719
- [Real Estate] (interpret deed/easement; differ from contract; resolve
ambiguous restrictive covenants in favor of free use)
Bright Solutions Inc. in
conjunction with Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. and The
Law Offices of James B. Gottstein are
pleased to present Alaska Supreme Court Opinions.
For more legal resources, visit the
The Alaska Legal Resource Center.
These Opinions were automatically converted to HTML (Hyper-Text Markup Language) format from electronic files provided by the Alaska Court System. Every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy, but neither
Bright Solutions Inc., Touch N' Go Systems, Inc.,
The Alaska Legal Resource Center, nor the Law Offices of James B. Gottstein
are responsible for their accuracy or for any damages arising out of any
possible inaccuracy. If any mistakes are found, please let us know -
E-Mail Us or otherwise contact
Bright Solutions Inc.
| Touch N' Go®, the DeskTop In-and-Out Board makes your office run smoother. Visit
Touch N' Go's Website to see how.
|
|
Bright Solutions is a team of bright, friendly people who specialize in
preventing and resolving computer problems, data recovery and computer
forensics. Their services have proven invaluable to many individuals, utility
companies, medical and legal offices, corporations, government entities and
professional offices all over the nation.
Touch N' Go Systems is a Windows and Windows NT consulting and
software development Company, specializing in:
- Windows and Windows NT environments, including networks.
- Trouble shooting
- Preparation of World-Wide-Web Hypertext documents (Home Pages, etc.)
- Scanning Services
Return to Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. Home Page.
Comments to E-Mail Us
(907) 274-7686
406 G Street Suite, 210
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
fax (907) 274-9493
Copyright 1995-5/14/2012 by Touch N' Go Systems, Inc. No copyright claim is made to the text of the Opinions.
Last Modified 5/14/2012