Advertising with us can place you in front of thousands of visitors a day. Learn more!
|
|
|
- Alaska Statutes.
- Title 25. Marital and Domestic Relations
- Chapter 25. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act
- Section 205. Continuing, Exclusive Jurisdiction.
previous:
Section 204. Simultaneous Proceedings in Another State.
next:
Section 206. Enforcement and Modification of Support Order By Tribunal Having Continuing Jurisdiction.
AS 25.25.205. Continuing, Exclusive Jurisdiction.
- (a) A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing, exclusive
jurisdiction over a child support order
- (1) as long as this state remains the residence of the obligor, the individual obligee, or the child for whose benefit the
support order is issued; or
- (2) until each individual party has filed written consent with the tribunal of this state for a tribunal of another state
to modify the order and assume continuing, exclusive jurisdiction.
- (b) A tribunal of this state issuing a child support order consistent with the law of this state may not exercise its
continuing jurisdiction to modify the order if the order has been modified by a tribunal of another state under a law
substantially similar to this chapter.
- (c) If a child support order of this state is modified by a tribunal of another state under a law substantially similar to
this chapter, a tribunal of this state loses its continuing, exclusive jurisdiction with regard to prospective
enforcement of the order issued in this state and may only
- (1) enforce the order that was modified as to amounts accruing before the modification;
- (2) enforce nonmodifiable aspects of that order; and
- (3) provide other appropriate relief for violations of that order that occurred before the effective date of the
modification.
- (d) A tribunal of this state shall recognize the continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of a tribunal of another state that
has issued a child support order under a law substantially similar to this chapter.
- (e) A temporary support order issued ex parte or pending resolution of a jurisdictional conflict does not create
continuing, exclusive jurisdiction in the issuing tribunal.
- (f) A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing, exclusive
jurisdiction over a spousal support order throughout the existence of the support obligation. A tribunal of this state
may not modify a spousal support order issued by a tribunal of another state having continuing, exclusive jurisdiction
over that order under the law of that state.
All content © 2008 by Touch
N' Go/Bright Solutions, Inc.
Note to HTML Version:
This version of the Alaska Statutes is current through December, 2007. The Alaska Statutes were automatically converted to HTML from a plain text format. Every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy, but this can not be guaranteed. If it is critical that the precise terms of the Alaska Statutes be known, it is recommended that more formal sources be consulted. For statutes adopted after the effective date of these statutes, see, Alaska State Legislature
If any errors are found, please e-mail Touch N' Go systems at E-mail. We
hope you find this information useful.